Saturday 13 March 2021

Not what I wanted to write about

I had intended to write about Skylarks today. At long last there is temporary fencing up on Wanstead Flats to keep people and dogs out of the breeding area. I have not been outside all week and as I approached it this morning there were Skylarks singing from within it. It cheered me up no end. Skirting around the edge of the new fence I met up with a couple of the local birders, and naturally it was our first topic of conversation. 



But this soon changed, and the Skylarks will need to wait for another day. The headlines at the moment are the kind of headlines nobody wants to see. In London this week a woman was snatched off the street, killed, and her body dumped in a wood in Kent. By a policeman of all people. Sarah Everard was her name. Reading about it yesterday I was shocked to hear that this poor lady was just one of over a hundred killed in the UK this year alone. Not all of last year, this year. A little over two months. I had no idea. Think about that for a moment. Two months. Think also about why none of them made the headlines. I have done no research, frankly I don't want to - it is appalling - but the fact of the matter is that without any fear of being remotely wrong about this almost all of those murders if not every single one will have been committed by a man. 

There has been a lot of response on social media. The one that everyone is talking about, at least in the circles that I inhabit, is from Lucy McRobert, a fellow birder. That's what our conversation turned to on Wanstead Flats this morning. You can read what she wrote here and I strongly suggest that you do, particularly if you are a man. There are a ton of awful real life quotes at the end of the article. Women know all this already, men likely do not. I don't know about you but I know very few female birders, the hobby seems to me to be an almost exclusively male pursuit in this country. So if you take that small subsection and extrapolate across the wider population can you imagine the scale? My own daughters have already been exposed to it from a white van window. One is just 13 years old. It is pervasive. It is dangerous. And sometimes and as we have all just heard about, it ends very badly.

Many will argue that a wolf whistle or an "oi darlin'" is just banter, boys will be boys. But that's a very male view. I suspect few women feel that way about it. Banter, however innocent or cheeky, emboldens. The sad fact of the matter is that from quite a young age women feel instinctively threatened by men. It is ingrained. I have experienced it out birding, likely you have too. You are out and about, likely in a quiet spot as these tend to be birdier than busy thoroughfares, and you cross paths with a woman. Immediately you feel awkward. What do you do? How do you signal that you are not one of those men? I subconsciously look through my bins, trying to clearly demonstrate that I am in this neck of the woods for an entirely innocent purpose, but in truth I don't know whether this is of any comfort at all. What else could I do? What should I do? Smile, wave, try and say hello? That feels creepy. Do nothing? Stand back? Walk the other other way? I am not sure there is anything I can do to provide instant reassurance, my gender is unfortunately immediately threatening and off-putting. That's not my own fault, but it is a cold hard fact, and it stems from years and years of abuse through the generations that means that still, in 2021, women are afraid. Afraid of what type of man I might be.

I have an inkling of what this fear is like. About 12 years ago I was mugged by four guys not far from where I live. A violent assault. The experience affected me greatly. For a while I was on edge whenever I was outside of the house. I avoided certain areas, areas where I felt penned in, and I only went where I had clear sight lines and could see people coming from a long way away. I remember frequently looking over my shoulder when walking in built up areas. When enough time had passed that I had stopped doing that, I remember walking down the pavement on my own street and not hearing a jogger coming up behind me - clearly a kind of Michael Holding. I jumped out of my skin. I was so clearly terrified that the jogger actually stopped and apologised. He didn't have to do that but at the time it was so appreciated. Clearly I have not forgotten about this and I never will, but time has proved to be a great healer and when I go birding I do so now without fear. When you read Lucy's article you realise quite quickly that women are not so lucky. They can never feel completely safe, completely at ease. Because of men. It goes without saying that it shouldn't be like this. And only men can change this. 

There has been a huge outpouring of support for Lucy and others who have spoken up. Pleasingly this has been mostly from men. The fact that me and my mates were talking about it this morning is also a good sign. Support has not been universal however. Enter Ronald. Ronald's response to Lucy's article was distinctly unsupportive. It was boorish and unpleasant. I had not been following the online conversation that had stemmed from the article, but when mention of Ronald appeared my heart sank as I knew exactly which Ronald this would be. And it was. I don't know Ronald, he may not even be real, a construct of a bored person's imagination perhaps, but I've had a run in with 'him' before and he is exactly the type of person you would expect him to be. I feel bad about even giving him airtime. Ronald does not like Europe for instance. He also does not like foreigners. Or immigration. He thinks that there are too many black people on the TV. And if he dislikes multiculturalism he absolutely hates woke lefties, remoaners and snowflakes. And so quelle surprise it also turns out he dislikes women enough to abuse them on social media for penning an uncomfortable truth. Way to go Ron. 

Ronald and his version of masculinity are not a rare phenomenon. He is particularly vile of course, and quite publicly so, but I reckon there are many men with similar views on women. Ronald is a jerk, for many reasons. Don't be like Ronald. And don't accept the Ronalds of this world as harmless idiots. 

15 comments:

  1. I had that feeling last week while hiking in a remote wooded area...suddenly coming from the other direction 2 men. I always keep moving and say hello...but IM alert to see if anything is amiss...it is no fun having to live in any fear. I don't let that stop me from going where I want to, but it angers me that I even have to think about it. I don't know this Ron person but he seems to be part of the problem. TC and enjoy the Skylarks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Sondra, I do feel for you, cannot be any fun to always have to be on your guard. Ron is a dinosaur, he is angry (very angry) at being marginalised, angry that he has had his time and that it won't come again. He's racist and misogynistic,, and best discarded on the scrap heap of history. By the way I recently had a read through some of your recent posts - somehow I like the takes of regular life interspersed with birding here and there. And the castigation of the GOP is appreciated too.

      Delete
  2. I remember being in a patch of woodland studying tree trunks at close range (looking for larval cases of psychids) when I noticed a lone lady wandering in my direction down the path. I knew I'd look suspicious "lurking" behind a tree trunk, so I took evasive action and squatted down until she passed, planning to stay hidden. Except she clocked me straight away, a scruffy six-footer squatting down behind a tree trunk next to a path and looking massively suspicious... She walked on and I quit the site before the police or her hubby arrived. Nothing more to that tale from my perspective, somewhat embarrassing yes despite my having a perfectly legitimate reason for being there, but no real skin off my nose. But what if that was her regular walk? Would she now feel unsafe entering those woods again? Had I forever 'ruined' that spot for her? I felt shit about it for some time, despite doing nothing wrong. The alternative would have been to say 'hello, honest I'm not a weirdo, I'm just looking for caterpillars on this tree trunk' and probably getting pepper sprayed in the face or kicked in the nuts. Hence I'm pretty careful nowadays not to put myself or others into those types of situations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's so sad... that said, as a woman, you do learn to recognise the "jizz" of wildlife geeks! But your intentions were good

      Delete
    2. Yes Seth, this is it exactly. You wish you could vanish into thin air so that the lady coming the other way never has to feel anxious, but you can't, and in trying to melt away it's entirely possible that you make things worse than they already are.

      Delete
  3. As a female reader and one who's quite often walking through south London around 9pm, I greatly appreciate this post. Time for change! Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good piece Jonathan. Re Ronald, I want F all to do with his ilk in any walk of life. I have also come across them on many occasions. I hate gammons, brexiters, the right wing tories, racists and tossers who would not see their behaviour as reprehensible if it were on a banner dragged being a plane. Their very presence drains the life force from me. They are one reason I hate sport too. Team sport, anyway. One tale from the 80s when I was just 18 in a Northern Working Mens Club, there used to be 'exotic dancers' on every Sunday morning (!). Men I knew would say 'Stew, are you coming in the strippers are about to start'. I always refused and made my excuses, not for any prudish dislike of women, but the exact opposite. I would hate to think those dancers thought I was like those other drooling letcherous drunks! Ive still never seen one 40 years later.

    Is it any wonder all my days are spent avoiding people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Have shared Lucy's writing on several Facebook pages - many positive comments, thank you again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good. I don't know Lucy at all btw, but she is relatively well known in birding circles and recently wrote a book. What she is saying is extremely important and needed to be said and widely distributed.

      Delete
  6. A great comparison to the fear post-mugging fear. I am lucky enough to have avoided that, but to experience a similar existential fear, at all times, because there is a significant subset of men, utterly indistinguishable from any others, who are complete, dangerous, shits? I cannot imagine.

    For me - not that anybody has asked, and I'm sure the world doesn't need another opinion - your comment "You wish you could vanish into thin air so that the lady coming the other way never has to feel anxious, but you can't, and in trying to melt away it's entirely possible that you make things worse than they already are" sums up exactly how I feel.

    I'm sure we've all inadvertently been *that guy* who has made a woman uncomfortable or scared, merely by existing in the wrong place at the wrong time. And while it might be inadvertent and we might apologise, reassure, feel bad about it for years after, we have contributed to that fear. The fact remains that until this is fixed, until men as a whole change, the mere act of being outside is an act of oppression, of anti-female aggression. And I don't know how to fix that, or if it's even entirely fixable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have definitely been that guy. And so was the jogger that went past me that time. Wrong place, wrong time. But to be on the receiving end of that each and every time must be incredibly wearing.

      Delete
  7. Good article.

    Lucy's article has been mostly well received but noticed some men objecting to it even being shared in the 'RSPB Birders' Facebook group and a few 'Ronalds' saying not only was Lucy wrong but that descended to the old 'white men are the real victims' trope.

    Of course all that did was confirm Lucy had a more than valid point...

    ReplyDelete