I've nearly caught up. The Brazil trip was in the summer, I think I arrived back on 5th July. The report itself wasn't started until late September, and even with the helping hand of AI which I used to save me typing out bird and palce names and put a togther summary paragraphs of eBird checklists in chronological order it has still taken me nearly a month to get it done. Of course I've had other things to do as well, an office job for instance, so it isn't as if I have been chained to my laptop, but still. Far longer than I would have thought.
![]() |
| Alternative header #1 |
I mentioned AI but in fact the process is much the same as it always was. Blogger on the right hand side of the screen, eBird on the left. Except this time I had a starting point. I downloaded my full eBird history as a csv file and then extracted the records pertaining to the Brazil dates. This results in one row per species; a checklist with 50 species will result in 50 rows. There were 56 checklists over the week and the resulting file had 1047 rows. Where each row sits is governed by a unique checklist ID, and one of the colums has a location, another a date, and another a time stamp. There is a load of other stuff but you can delete it all to make the file size much smaller. Then it is simply a question of prompting AI software, in my case CoPilot and whichever LLM sits behind that, to take this list and generate a series of paragraphs saying where I saw what. I told it to do it in time stamp order, separate out the days, put all bird species names in bold, if counts were notable to add these, and then rather than simply generate a list to put some basic text in to allow it to flow. So it adds things like "in the tall trees", or "in the Varzea scrub" and so on, or "Early in the morning we arrived at such and such a site". Some of this I retained, a huge amount of it I deleted. It created a fictional pond because a checklist contained ducks for instance, so that had to go, and largely my memory filled in exactly where a bird was, if it was in a tree, if it was in a bush and so on. The thing I found hardest to deal with is that it did not know what order birds were seen in and some of the checklists were five hours long. This meant there was a lot of reordering of the paragaraphs to do. What I eventually ended up doing was typing as I normally would but just above the AI text in question. I could then lift bird names or sequences of bird names from the AI-generated paragraphs to drop into my own narrative. Then I would delete these from the lower text and see what was left. I am convinced this saved me ages. All the while the real eBird checklist was on the other side of the screen so I could check everything was accurate - and this time it was. I had been very specific about telling it to only use the csv file and nothing else having caught it adding random birds during my first attempts at doing this a number of months ago.
The piece de restistance was the trip list on the final post. I used my last Brazil 2025 one as the template, gave it the trimmed list of species - this time all I needed was the name and the date - and said "copy that". It worked out how I had grouped bird families and which taxonomy I had used, and then did exactly the same with a nice even split between the two columns. It decided to go a little off-piste with its own formatting, but with a little bit of reprompting I was able to get it back to how the original looked. What you learn when doing this is how iterative a process it can be but I've saved the various steps and next time I expect it to get to the end point in one hit. After I had the basic structure of the list a further prompt asked it to assign checkmarks to show which species had been seen on which day. This used to take me forever; CoPilot did it in 30 seconds for all 367 species across 9 days. Humanity's entire future may be in doubt but boy can this thing make a list.
Once I had the text then the blog side of my screen was replaced with the gallery of downloaded photos from the day. I would select the ones that I wanted, process them in Photoshop, add the watermark and then upload them to Google. I'd do the same with any photos from my phone, forest-scapes, people, the rivers and so, and then size them to either 1000px or 850px and upload them too. Then back to blogger to insert them between paragraphs, a final read through to check for missing words, stupdi spellnig mistakes and so on, and then publish. I lost count of the number of hours spent, suffice to say it was a lot. But not as many as it might have been. The net result was 13,378 words and 156 images.
![]() |
| Alternative header #2 |
To date, and acknowledging that I have only just finished, this marathon effort has garnered two interactions. Two, and one had nothing whatsoever to do with Brazil - you know who you are! I realise this is very much par for the course when it comes to my foreign adventures but the comment that did in fact relate to Brazil made me laugh out loud - it was to point out a mistake I'd made labelling a photo. It is lucky I have a sense of humour. I appreciate it of course, it meant I was able to correct it. But honestly.
Nevermind. It was still worth it to relive the experience and, in future years, something to look back on. I was also able to embellish my eBird checklists with some of the photos I took. Unfortunately all three of us seem to have taken the exact same photos of the exact same species. Bob or Richard would notice me lift my camera and do the same, or vice versa, if any bird actually came close enough. So if you go to the website you will see lists of 50 species with 48 of them unillustrated. But those lucky two will have multiple images from all three of us!
So I'm done. Finished! There is nothing quite like the relief of pressing publish on that final post, which in my case is always the aforementioned trip list, ideally accompanied by a photo of a small panther in habitat if I remembered to take one. If I remembered, as if.... I have one more short trip to write up, a long weekend on the Scilly Islands for the birders pelagics, but the weather was so calm and sunny that there is virtually nothing to write about so this will be very quick!


Actually I am not Pembrokeshire Birds I am Rosemary Royle. We did a trip to Manaus and then a river trip up the Rio Negro in Aug/Sept 2024. We are pretty well travelled and birded in South American terms, but found the birding here was AMAZING. Harpy Eagle on the nest with ease, then one from the boat very close. Guianian Cock of the Rock. 5 species of Jacamar. Orinoco Goose. Pink-footed Tarantulas - oh, not a bird. Capuchin Bird - something I had never expected to see plus many others including very localised ant-things as mentioned in your reports. I am puzzled as to why this location is not better known as a birding destination. It was lovely to read your report as it brought back so many memories.
ReplyDeleteIt's a bit of a mission to get to, and I think people may just be a bit apprehensive about going somewhere that seemingly remote. In fact it isn't remote at all these days. Fabulous birding, thanks very much for getting in touch.
DeletePS I saw your Orphean Warbler back in 2013! Thank you very much!!
Yes, I saw you in the crowd .........
DeleteI do look at all the lovely pictures but am less confident that I've read every word ... though I am sure the time you spend on that is valuable for you in the longer term.
ReplyDeleteAnd I carefully read all of this post - the methodology for using AI but staying in control is of great interest to me!
I’m a relatively new follower, but I’ve read every stupdi word since 2024. I’ve rarely commented, partly because we don’t know each other, partly because I couldn’t think of anything witty enough to match the quality of your posts, and partly because you’re a bit of a curmudgeon. But that’s no excuse for staying silent, so this is an overdue and heartfelt thank you.
ReplyDeleteYour photography is stunning. Full stop. I also love how wonderfully your adventures are documented. The logistics and lists can be dry AF, but without that context the whole thing would feel performative and soulless, rather than a skilled craftsman sharing what worked for him. Plans don’t always work out, and you own (some of) your mistakes, which is endearing. And the manner in which you do it – your snark – reliably earns a wry smile.
If I go a few weeks without an update, I get genuine FOMO. It’s not because what you’re doing is heroic or superhuman, but because it’s relatable and somewhat enviable (even if you’re never going to win a climate champion award). It’s dreamy stuff, and I’m greatly appreciative of you taking us all along for the ride.
Probably more than most, you know this sort of effort is mostly thankless. But I truly believe some of these write-ups could and should be considered works of art. So before you split-out your Puligny 1er Cru, consider that, like all good art, your work has intention, honed craft, and a distinctive personality, and it has the potential to move, delight, and absorb the reader. Unfortunately, recognition for short-form writing, and blog posts especially, is often slow, uneven, and unfair to people blazing their own path.
By no means does the following list make up for my failure to acknowledge your efforts until now, but:
ReplyDeleteI agree with the complimentary Graham Watson. I’m glad the enthusiasm has returned, starting with your Gambia and Senegal trip.
I’m delighted you replaced your Canon with a Sony. Brave choice. I happen to have my eye on a Sony as well.
Iceland, let’s go!! Turned out to be mostly gulls.
A Dodge Challenger with a hood scoop for birding, really!? Who are you, Mad Max?
That was some cheek with the Northern Yucatan police. Less Mad Max, more Cool Hand Luke.
I’m thinking to myself: 1) “Who the hell goes to the Moroccan border with Western Sahara and troubles the bored (and armed!) border guards?” and 2) “I had no idea there was such an incredible variety of desert Wheatears.”
Texel, eh? Like everybody else, for the Spectacled Eider. This should be interesting...
Equally interesting were posts for Slovenia and Venice.
And Jersey? For the weekend?! Nice! Good on you. I’ll secret that idea away for future consideration.
Your investigation of Wanstead Birder with AI on the plane was intriguing. With your 2,300 posts and 16 years of experience,
I truly suspect the AI is learning from you. You should sue for royalties.
Wow, what’s the fascination with palms?
How very tame, East Wemyss. And not much different from my patch (because I can’t relate to Wanstead Flats). Though I did like the anecdote about standing on the toilet with your head out of the Velux to cinch a flyover GWE. Your tales of errant Flats users trashing the place are a good read too. The worst we get on my patch are menacing (off-road) motorcycling youths, fly-tipping, and the constant threat of industrial development.
“Patch plastic” is a new term for me.
Once again I’m astonished you had the wherewithal to get to Brazil on the back of your other overseas adventures. But I’m beginning to see this is par for the course (#AlwaysOnHoliday). What an amazing trip it was, even, seemingly, in central São Paulo.
I loved the Coast and Castles summary, particularly Mrs. L’s patience with you birding from the bike. There were indeed more pictures of you than normal, which was welcome. It was the first time I’d seen you in front of the camera.
The Fife Seawatching and Played for and Got posts are some of my all-time favourites.
A Nuthatch for number 100, respectable. It’s fun to compare patches. Nuthatch is expected for us, but the leading patch birder here only has 135 species or so (and that includes patch plastic like Indian Peafowl, Bar-headed Goose, and Black Swan).
Latvia!? Rubbing shoulders with Jancis Robinson, sheesh, what a life!
What is this guy like, flying to Hanover to string a series of bus journeys together, somewhat aimlessly, then hoping to navigate all the way back on a Sunday with limited German? What could possibly go wrong? Nothing, seemingly (other than a wrong turn in a random field). It’s also striking how much more frequent some birds appear on the Continent versus here in Blighty.
[Cont'd]
ReplyDeleteI had only the most passing awareness of the Asa Wright Nature Centre. I loved experiencing it through your eyes. I’ve been wanting to get to St. Kitts, so the Grenada summary, even if it wasn’t primarily about birding, was welcome too.
You’re not the only person to foreswear further twitching after dipping the Black-winged Kite (at least initially). You could easily have omitted that dark episode, but it’s these lesser-remembered posts that make the content feel relatable.
Thailand sounded amazing, although I didn’t recognise over 90% of the bird names. And jamming the Spoon-billed Sandpiper within 20 minutes? That’s the stuff of legend.
Tuscany and Piedmont aren’t really my bag. But go on, I’m hooked. You’ve earned my trust as a tastemaker, and I know I won’t be disappointed.
Meditative Morocco? Bless. I appreciated the different, more reflective tone, though I was genuinely worried you were about to hang your blogging hat up permanently.
Oregon for the weekend: nutter.
New Mexico and the sky islands of Arizona, oh yes please! At winter’s end? Well, you can’t have everything.
Georgia?! Both birds and wine; it’d be rude not to. Extreme adventures (with delicious catering) don’t publish themselves.
Pootling down the Voie des Vignes? Don’t mind if I do. Wines. Wines! WINES!!
On the AI trip reports, I’m intrigued… It’s fascinating to watch you get to grips with the technology. I hope it collapses the burden of sharing your colourful adventures. I’ll admit to pining a little for the older reports however. I believe I can tell the difference between your latest Brazil report and the earlier one with Bruno: the content is similar, but there’s more of you in the earlier one (and, characteristically, more typos). Still, you’re juggling plenty, so why not give it a try?
All this fanboy gushing no doubt makes me sound sycophantic, but I mean every word. Your work is eagerly anticipated, stands out for its authenticity, and deserves far more credit and acknowledgement than it currently gets.
Now, roll on the Scilly pelagics summary, having teased us twice with that Wilson’s Petrel photo.